Hot Rod Magazine 4.3L v6 Engine Build

Posted on 01 March 2009 by Evan

Note:
This post is from an article by David Freiburger from Hot Rod magazine’s website.
You can see their original article here.

Chevy 3.4L 262ci V-6 – The 3/4 350
By David Freiburgerhotrod_v6_1
Photography by David Freiburger

We were more excited to buzz this turkey on the dyno than we usually are with some whumpin’ big-block. Why? It’s different. Not too many people build V-6s any more. Perhaps we found out why, but we still think it’s neat-or at least cute. See, the ‘85-up Chevy 4.3L, 262ci V-6 is very much like a small-block Chevy minus the number 3 and 6 cylinders (check the valve layout and you’ll see how we came up with that conclusion). They’re common in ‘88-up trucks, and we still get so many letters asking how to feed a V-8 to an S-10 truck that this time we elected to answer the question no one asked: How do you get more wheeze out of the stock 4.3?

But first, a little V-6 lore. The units we’re concerned with are the Chevy 90-degree variety, meaning that the cylinder banks are set at a 90-degree angleto each other, just like a small-block V-8. The bore centers (4.400) and deck height (9.025) are also identical to a Mouse motor. The ‘85-up 4.3L V-6 has the same bore and stroke as a 350 V-8 (4.000×3.480), and takes the same pistons, cam bearings, main bearings, valvetrain parts, timing cover, oil pump, and front dress. Any V-8 trans will bolt right up to the 90-degree sixer. The 4.3L has much more performance potential than the ‘78-’79 200ci V-6 or the ‘80-’84 229ci version due to those engines’ small 3.500- and 3.736-inch bores (they’re like mini 262ci and 305ci V-8s). Also, the 200 and 229 have semi-odd-fire cranks (132/108-degree firing), while the 4.3Ls are true even-fire engines. Not that 4.3s aren’t still quivering little suckers, hence the introduction of a balance shaft in the lifter valley of 4.3s beginning in late ‘92 or early ‘93. The even-fire 4.3 cranks can be identified by their split-pin cranks-each rod pin is offset in the middle by 30 degrees. There are also common-pin V-6 cranks (they look just like conventional V-8 cranks) developed for the Chevy V-6’s Busch Grand National racing days, but those are odd-fire units.

Like the Chevy V-8, the 90-degree V-6 saw some transition during production: factory hydraulic roller lifters, one-piece rear-main seals, and center-bolt valve covers all appeared in ‘86-’87. Just like a V-8, one-piece-seal cranks can be swapped into two-piece-seal blocks with commonly available adapters. The 4.3L has been offered with carburetors, throttle-body injection, and the current central-port Vortech injection that was introduced in ‘95 (we think) along with an intake-manifold flange that requires vertical bolts; as far as we know, a carbureted intake is not available for V-6 Vortech heads.

1.hotrod_v6_2
We began the 4.3L V-6 buildup with the knowledge that the pistons are the same as a 350 V-8’s. Our pick was the Speed Pro LW2256-F-060, a lightweight forging (686 grams) with four valve reliefs with 6.1 cc of dish. The rings are Sealed Power R9902-060 file-fits set at 0.024 and 0.020, a bit wide so we can hammer this thing with nitrous and not worry about butting the end gaps. The V-6 is known as a shaker, so we had Dougan’s Engine do a precision balance job.

2.hotrod_v6_3
The 4.3L conrods are 5.700 inches like a 350, but the journal size is 2.250 rather than the V-8’s 2.100; we presume that the reason for the bigger journal is to add strength to the offset-style rod pins on the crank. Dougan’s was able to modify Milodon 190,000-psi rod bolts for a 350 application just by clearancing the heads a bit, as shown on the right.

3.hotrod_v6_4
If our descriptions of a split-pin crank seemed a bit muddy, this photo should light a bulb for you. See how two rods (arrows) on the same journal are offset a bit? They’re also separated by a cast-in thrust surface, and hence, the rods are narrower than a V-8’s. Still, Sealed Power makes tri-metal bearings for the application (PN 6-1020CP). The Milodon main studs and oil-pump stud were sourced from a V-8 application. The oil-filter pad is much tinier than a V-8’s; it takes an AC PF52 filter.

4.hotrod_v6_5
The Speed Pro pistons come stock with 6.1cc of valve relief. Combined with stock heads that Dougan’s checked at 68cc chambers, pistons that we set at an average of 0.010 below deck, and Fel-Pro head gaskets with 0.041 compressed thickness, the V-6 would have 9.63:1 compression. Stock was 8.6:1. Because we changed plans midstream and decided to someday try the Vortech blower for carbs on this engine (see the story in this issue), we asked Dougan’s to mill a 3.475×0.060 dish in the pistons for a total volume of 12 cc, lowering the compression to 9.08:1. For now, it runs fine on cheap gas.

5.hotrod_v6_6
To wrap up the bottom end, we twisted Dougan’s builder Jeff Jacobs’ arm until he agreed to modify our Milodon 350 windage tray to fit the V-6. He cut a few inches off the front, enlarged one bolt hole (arrow) to clear the dipstick tube, and tweaked a few louvers to fit the stock oil pan. Also check out the oil pump and pickup-they are Sealed Power part numbers 224-43469V (pump) and 224-14263 (pickup), an upgrade over the stock V-6 parts because they employ a 3/4-inch pickup tube. The steel oil-pump driveshaft is Sealed Power PN 224-6146E.

6.hotrod_v6_7
Dougan’s Ray Field spotted the funky V-6 balancer (left) with a lip around the edge that might prevent the use of aftermarket pulleys even though the bolt pattern is the same as a V-8. You can use conventional short- or long-water-pump accessories on the 4.3. We also wanted a steel balancer in case we ever add the blower, and we needed an SFI-approved balancer for the track. Dougan’s found that the Pioneer balancer (PN 872021) on the right is a 6.125-inch, lightweight V-8 unit that would fit perfectly. Neat! The 4.3L is an internally balanced engine like a 350.

7.hotrod_v6_7
A 4.3L can be cammed just like it was a 350 because each cylinder has the same displacement as its V-8 bro, though cams will seem bigger in the V-6 because there’s less power overlap. Off-the-shelf cam grinds are pretty tiny for use with the OE computer-controlled applications that house most of these engines. We nabbed Comp Cams biggest hydraulic roller for our factory roller block, a 280HR with 224/224 duration at 0.050, 0.525 lift, and a 110-degree lobe-separation angle. The cam kit (PN K09-430-8) comes with cam, lifters, retainers, locks, seals, timing set, valvesprings, pushrods, guideplates, and rocker studs. At $638.69 (Summit), it’s the biggest expense of the buildup, but also the key to making this thing run.

8.hotrod_v6_9
During assembly, Dougan’s pointed out that the 0.350-inch lobe lift was all the block could take-any more and the hydraulic lifter would hit the stock-style link bars.

9.hotrod_v6_10
The valvesprings supplied by Comp were PN 986, though Dougan’s stepped it up to a slightly stiffer 987 because we so often see valve float at 6,000 rpm with hydraulic rollers; as it turned out the power peak was at 5,500 anyway. However, either spring has a 1.430-inch diameter and the V-6 heads need to be machined to accept them, then the springs need stiff shims because there’s not much meat in a few of the seats. Dougan’s also modified the heads for 3/8-inch screw-in studs since we didn’t trust the press-in style above 0.500-inch valve lift.

10.hotrod_v6_11
Speaking of lift, we amped the cam’s 0.525 lift with 1.5:1 rockers up to 0.560 inch by substituting Comp Cams 1.6: Pro Magnum rockers (PN 1301-12). Next time we’d use the new self-guided rockers (PN 1318-12) and omit the guideplates, as the V-6 heads had some pushrod-angle problems with the V-8-type guideplates. We were surprised that the stock center-bolt valve covers cleared the rockers with no modifications.

11.hotrod_v6_12
Because we found no practical aftermarket heads, and because simply cutting one cylinder off a V-8 head won’t work, we had our pal Brulio at Westech Performance hog the stock heads for increased flow. These heads are terrible, and even after porting, they only flow about as well as stock 305 Chevy heads. Peak numbers were 208 cfm on the intake and 190 on the exhaust, which was a giant improvement over the pathetic 138/116-cfm baseline. Helping the cause were Milodon Megaflow swirl-polished, tulipped valves in 2.02/1.60 sizes (PNs 45015 and 45045), an upgrade over the stock 1.94/1.50s. Consider these steps mandatory to making any kind of decent power with your V-6.

12.hotrod_v6_13
Fel-Pro gaskets were used throughout our little engine, and even though the intake set was clearly marked, we screwed up the first time and put them on backwards. Do so and you block the water passages to the head at the front of the block; they are shown here properly installed. Also note that we blocked off the heat crossover.

13.hotrod_v6_14
Header selection is very limited, and while Edelbrock makes tubular manifolds and systems for truck applications, they wouldn’t fit the dyno. Instead we used a set of long-tube, coated S-10 headers from Hooker (PN 2842-1) They have tiny 15/8-inch primaries. 26-inch tubes, and small 21/2-inch collectors. We ran all our tests with collector extensions but no mufflers.

14.hotrod_v6_15
Ignitionwise, MSD still makes even-fire (PN 8597) and odd-fire (PN 8596) Pro Billet distributors for the 90-degree V-6. We used an even-fire unit with MSD 8.5mm Heli-Core wires and a Digital-7 ignition box. Note that the Demon or Holley-type carburetors will not fit this engine unless a 2-inch carb-spacer is used-otherwise the float bowls hit the distributor and water neck. If you don’t want a cowl hood, stick with the Edelbrock carb.

15.hotrod_v6_16
Intake-manifold selection is very limited, and we chose an Edelbrock Performer (PN 2111). This is a very low-rise intake, and we made best power with a 2-inch spacer from Wilson Manifolds. The initial carb we used was an Edelbrock 500, which seemed to be jetted perfectly right out of the box. It turned in 288 hp at 5,400 and 303 lb-ft at 4,400. But strangely, the V-6 saw about 1.5 inches of manifold vacuum at WOT, indicating that the carb was a tad too small.

16.hotrod_v6_17
We didn’t have a 600-cfm Edelbrock to try, so we added a 650-cfm Mighty Demon. It’s nearly 300 bucks more than the Edelbrock 500, but kicked the power up to what we were looking for: 300 hp and 316 lb-ft.

The Buzz of Power
RPM HP TORQUE
3,500 194.8 292.3
3,600 200.5 292.4
3,700 209.5 297.3
3,800 216.4 299.1
3,900 224.9 302.9
4,000 232.4 305.1
4,100 241.5 309.4
4,200 250.3 313.0
4,300 258.1 315.2
4,400 265.3 316.6
4,500 269.6 314.7
4,600 274.9 313.9
4,700 279.0 311.8
4,800 285.0 311.8
4,900 289.6 310.4
5,000 291.9 306.7
5,100 293.3 302.1
5,200 296.4 299.4
5,300 297.1 294.4
5,400 297.3 289.1
5,500 301.2 287.7
5,600 301.1 282.4
5,700 300.8 277.2
5,800 299.1 270.8
5,900 296.6 264.0
6,000 293.1 256.6

14 Comments For This Post

  1. Roger Says:

    I have an 89 chevy k1500 that is in very good shape,its been sitting for 3 yrs and Iam going to get it back on the road again for one of my employe’s to drive.It has a 4.3L V-6 wich is tired and needs to be rebuilt.Trans is the old cast iron 4 spd with 1st as a granny gear.The engine build you did on Dougan’s motor sounds like a possibility.Do you think milage would suffer or increase and is there an after market TBI unit available that’s compatible with stock electronic componets.Iam going for reliability,good gas milage and a power boost(we tow a lot of the time).Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.

  2. Howard Hudson Says:

    love the build, im a big fan of the 4.3. I have a 84 jeep cherokee i want to build one for. im interested in the big torque numbers you pulled from 3500 rpms up any new stories on the mini mouse and im there

  3. Johnny Fletcher Says:

    I have a 03 S10 pickup with the Vortec 4.3, would i be able to do what yall did to the older 4.3 yall worked on. My truck drives like a hotrod i just want more power out of my 4.3.

  4. gary mcdaniel Says:

    I have a 2000 chevy blazer with a 4.3 v-6 two door. I would like to add a little more power. I average about 20 mpg in town but it just does not have any power. Can I do something about this with out loosing alot of mpg. Any ideas would be a great help.

  5. jimmy phillips Says:

    how much would you charge for a carb model of this motor with a turbo header and adility to hold around 15 to 25 pounds of boost

  6. iigw.org Says:

    i have a 97 4.3 layin in the yard that i have been wanting to put in my jeep. i think i just found the reason to rebuild it and put it in the jeep..

  7. Jeff Wasy Says:

    Great build, The cpi versions came out in 92-95. This version had the 200 hp but they all have the balanced shaft which you stated was not good for a performance build, due to clearance issues. If you put on the cpi penulum I wonder if you could get more hp than a carb? I put a 93 cpi in my mazda b2200 mini truck. Great engine, light and powerful to spin 36in tsl’s. Would like to rework the heads some day to get more flow as stated. thanks

  8. Mark Pugh Says:

    Thanks for the idea. I’m building a Lotus 7 and was going to put a 4 cylinder in it but, you all have led me to the light. I think this just might work.

  9. brett eutsey Says:

    I have a 93 s10 that im currently building… i have gm boe tie heads (datona dash racing series) 18degree low port heads…plesae does any one know where i can find a single plain intake for this combo…its the last part i need

  10. monty lirones Says:

    I have a 1981 chevy Malibu 229 v6 k engine all new master over haul kit hooked to a Turbo 350 with a shift kit,and a 3000 stall torque converter its fun fast.But not thrilling fast. But in the garage I have a 4.3l that needs gone thru ,230000 miles on it. Can I use the heads for the fresh 229ci from the 4.3l ? and will S-10 headers fit the malibu. Just want more v6 horse power rrrrr rrrr Thanks Monty

  11. floyd self Says:

    I built a 4.3 about 6 years ago using prebalancer block that came with a four barrel intake and carb. The intake weighed a ton. I wanted to go with vortech heads, so I sourced a late model marine four barrel intake from Chevrolet. That’s how I got a carb on my Vortech heads.

  12. Joseph Says:

    I would love it if you guys did a build with TBI. I have a TBI and was looking into a Vortech Supercharger. I love the challenge of making power out of a V6 rather than another V8.

  13. Jeff Says:

    i want to do something like this in my 94 ss s10 but i wand to push 400-450 hp before spray and 600 after. i am in the process of gathering the parts for this and hope to be able to share the results someday soon

  14. John Eaton Says:

    I have a built 4.3 with the 23 degree heads and matching intake from GM. I also have another set of 18 degree head(aluminum)both sets are. The engine was a 2000 and my engine builder kept the balance shaft. in it. a first it had the iron vortec heads and Edelbrock intake. He estimated around 300 HP. Now with the Aluminum head and intake he said I should be around 350HP. I know it runs GREAT!! I have some pics. Special ground cam from Lunati. johneaton699@hotmail.com

Leave a Reply

-->
-->